Wolters Kluwer Financial Services
ComplianceHeadquarters Home Page
AML/PATRIOT Act Lending Residential Real Estate Deposit/Ops IRA
 
  Tools  
Legislative Watch
Q & A
Discussions
E-mail Alerts
Archives
Research Links
Product Center
Search

Advanced Search

AML/PATRIOT Act Article

Printer Friendly Format

Email Page to a Friend  

 

 
Sharing Information Under Section 314(b)
 

Sue Burt, Senior Attorney - Bankers Systems Inc.
November 2003

 
Outline
Overview
314(b) Information Sharing
Examination Procedures
Compliance Tips
Conclusion
 
   
Additional Resources
BSA Examination procedures:
   * OCC
   * FRB
   * FDIC
   * OTS
   * NCUA - not yet       published
Section 314(a) regulation
   
USA PATRIOT Act Compliance Products
 
   

Overview

Section 314(b) of the USA PATRIOT Act, which allows for the sharing of information between financial institutions, has been in effect since September 26, 2002. Although a number of institutions have gone through the notice/certification process, many institutions seem reluctant to implement the process and actually share money laundering or terrorist activity information.

This article will provide an overview of the information sharing process under section 314(b) of the USA PATRIOT Act, discuss recent examination procedures that impact this area and offer compliance tips to insure any information sharing follows the law. Hopefully, the information contained in this article will help your organization move forward and fully implement the section 314(b) sharing process.

314(b) Information Sharing

The purpose of section 314 (b) of the USA PATRIOT Act is to encourage financial institutions to share information for the purpose of identifying and reporting activities that may involve terrorist activity or money laundering. Prior to section 314 (b), institutions were reluctant to share such information for fear of violating privacy laws or being accused of sharing information that was false. To remove the risk of potential liability, the regulators created a notice/certification process for section 314(b) purposes. An institution that provides notice to the Treasury Department, on an annual basis, stating that it intends to engage in information sharing and certifying that it has established procedures to safeguard the information, and follows those procedures, will be protected from civil liability. Following the section 314 (b) process is voluntary; institutions are not required to share information if they choose not to. However, institutions that share and fail to follow section 314 (b) will lose the statutory safe harbor and may be found in violation of privacy laws or other laws or regulations. Finally, in order to safely share information under section 314(b) you must verify that the institution you plan to share with has also filed the appropriate notice/certification with the Treasury Department.

Examination Procedures

Recently, the federal banking regulators released examination guidance that provides useful information regarding what to expect during the section 314(b) portion of your next BSA/AML examination.

Request Letter Items

Prior to your next BSA/AML exam, your regulator may issue a “Request Letter” that asks for a number of items needed by the examiner to facilitate the examination. Requested items may include:

  • A copy of your policy and procedures for sharing suspected terrorist activity or money laundering information pursuant to section 314 (b).
  • A copy of your policy and procedures for receiving information pertaining to terrorist activity or money laundering pursuant to section 314 (b).
  • Copies of any SARs filed related to section 314 (b) sharing or information.
  • The analysis or documentation regarding situations where an SAR filing was considered but the decision was made to not actually file a SAR.

Policy and Procedure Review

During the actual examination, your examiner will review your compliance management system for sharing terrorist or money laundering activity. The examination process will generally involve the following:

  • Examiner discussions with management to determine whether your institution intends to share information regarding terrorist or money laundering activity.
  • If your intention is to share, the examiner will evaluate your policies and procedures for sharing and receiving shared information. At a minimum, your policies and procedure should:

    1. Specify a point of contact for receiving and providing information;
    2. Ensure the safeguarding and confidentiality of the information received and requested;
    3. Provide a process for sending and responding to requests which ensures that those you intend to share will have filed the proper notice;
    4. Provide procedures for determining whether and when SARs should be filed;
    5. Describe the process for documenting your compliance;
    6. Contain sufficient internal controls;
    7. Address ongoing training;
    8. Test for compliance on an independent basis.

  • If your institution is sharing but not following the section 314(b) process, your examiner will notify those examiners who review for compliance with the privacy laws.
  • Your examiner will expect to review your documentation by sampling both information shared and shared information received. From this, they will evaluate how you determined whether or not to submit a SAR.

Compliance Tips

The following tips are intended to help your organization comply with the section 314(a) requirements.

  • Participation Encouraged. The government established the section 314(b) process to encourage the sharing of information relating to money laundering or terrorist activity. By sharing this information, it may be possible to thwart future illegal activity. The war against terrorism impacts everyone and all attempts to combat the problem should be considered.

  • Safe harbor provided. To sweeten the deal, the government has offered safe harbor protection from liability to those organizations that follow the section 314(b) process. With this protection from civil liability, you will not be liable for violating privacy or other related laws.

  • It takes two. The section 314(b) process is a two-way street. In order to take advantage of the safe harbor protection, you need to follow the notification process and you need to make sure that those you share with have followed the process. Verify that you have a procedure in place for documenting whether a particular institution has completed the notice requirements under section 314(b). This may include retaining a copy of the other institution’s 314 notice, obtaining a statement that the institution has complied with the 314 or some other method.

  • Review information security systems. The section 314(b) process requires that you certify that you have procedures in place to safeguard information you release and take in. The regulators have said that your process for keeping information secure will be sufficient if it tracks your information security program under the GLB privacy laws.

  • Limit your conversations. The section 314(b) process is intended to cover information sharing regarding money laundering or terrorist activity. The sharing of information beyond this subject matter is not protected under section 314.

  • Educate management. The new examination procedures state that examiners will converse with management to determine whether you are sharing in accordance with section 314(b). Verify that your management is clear as to your information sharing practices and whether or not you are following the section 314(b) process.

  • Other AML laws may apply. Information sharing under 314(b) does not relieve you of your OFAC or BSA obligations. Transactions may need to be block and SARs may need to be filed and these decisions should be made in accordance with the appropriate law.

Conclusion

The Section 314(b) process is voluntary; you do not have to share information if you do not want to. However, given the safe harbor protections, it is something your institution should give serious thought to. If institutions refuse to share information and terrorist activity continues to escalate, it is possible the government would issue laws that require sharing. Government regulations often hit more than the intended target and the last thing most institutions need is another expensive regulation to abide by.

                                        Back to Top

   
     
 
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Copyright Information Terms and Conditions Site Map